Alibaba QwenGuard4B vs Meta Llama Guard
Detailed comparison for runtime guardrails
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Meta Llama Guard is the more secure of the two: QwenGuard4B scores NaN% and Llama Guard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Llama Guard is the overall winner in this comparison!
Guardrail Metrics
F1 Score
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
False Positive Rate
False Negative Rate
Average Latency (ms)
p50 Latency (ms)
p90 Latency (ms)
Key Highlights
No specific highlights generated for this comparison.
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Alibaba QwenGuard4B or Meta Llama Guard more secure?
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Meta Llama Guard is the more secure of the two: QwenGuard4B scores NaN% and Llama Guard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
What is the F1 score of QwenGuard4B vs Llama Guard?
QwenGuard4B scores NaN% F1 and Llama Guard scores NaN% F1 on Guardion's prompt-attack benchmark. F1 balances precision and recall — higher is better.
How were QwenGuard4B and Llama Guard tested?
Both were evaluated via API at production-like sensitivity against 30+ prompt-attack categories using zero-shot, Crescendo, and TAP methods, scored by F1.