Alibaba QwenGuard4B vs AWS Bedrock Guardrails
Detailed comparison for runtime guardrails
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, AWS Bedrock Guardrails is the more secure of the two: QwenGuard4B scores NaN% and Bedrock Guardrails scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Bedrock Guardrails is the overall winner in this comparison!
Guardrail Metrics
F1 Score
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
False Positive Rate
False Negative Rate
Average Latency (ms)
p50 Latency (ms)
p90 Latency (ms)
Key Highlights
- AWS Bedrock Guardrails has a better F1 Score.
- AWS Bedrock Guardrails has a better Accuracy.
- AWS Bedrock Guardrails has a better Precision.
- AWS Bedrock Guardrails has a better Recall.
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better False Positive Rate.
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better False Negative Rate.
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better Average Latency (ms).
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better p50 Latency (ms).
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better p90 Latency (ms).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Alibaba QwenGuard4B or AWS Bedrock Guardrails more secure?
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, AWS Bedrock Guardrails is the more secure of the two: QwenGuard4B scores NaN% and Bedrock Guardrails scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
What is the F1 score of QwenGuard4B vs Bedrock Guardrails?
QwenGuard4B scores NaN% F1 and Bedrock Guardrails scores NaN% F1 on Guardion's prompt-attack benchmark. F1 balances precision and recall — higher is better.
How were QwenGuard4B and Bedrock Guardrails tested?
Both were evaluated via API at production-like sensitivity against 30+ prompt-attack categories using zero-shot, Crescendo, and TAP methods, scored by F1.