Alibaba QwenGuard4B vs GuardionAI ModernGuard
Detailed comparison for runtime guardrails
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, GuardionAI ModernGuard is the more secure of the two: QwenGuard4B scores NaN% and ModernGuard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
ModernGuard is the overall winner in this comparison!
Guardrail Metrics
F1 Score
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
False Positive Rate
False Negative Rate
Average Latency (ms)
p50 Latency (ms)
p90 Latency (ms)
Key Highlights
- GuardionAI ModernGuard has a better F1 Score.
- GuardionAI ModernGuard has a better Accuracy.
- GuardionAI ModernGuard has a better Precision.
- GuardionAI ModernGuard has a better Recall.
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better False Positive Rate.
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better False Negative Rate.
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better Average Latency (ms).
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better p50 Latency (ms).
- Alibaba QwenGuard4B has a better p90 Latency (ms).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Alibaba QwenGuard4B or GuardionAI ModernGuard more secure?
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, GuardionAI ModernGuard is the more secure of the two: QwenGuard4B scores NaN% and ModernGuard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
What is the F1 score of QwenGuard4B vs ModernGuard?
QwenGuard4B scores NaN% F1 and ModernGuard scores NaN% F1 on Guardion's prompt-attack benchmark. F1 balances precision and recall — higher is better.
How were QwenGuard4B and ModernGuard tested?
Both were evaluated via API at production-like sensitivity against 30+ prompt-attack categories using zero-shot, Crescendo, and TAP methods, scored by F1.