Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs xAI Grok-2
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Grok-2 scores 46.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen QwQ 32B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs xAI Grok-2. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B or xAI Grok-2 more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Grok-2 scores 46.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen QwQ 32B vs Grok-2?
Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Grok-2 has a 46.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Qwen QwQ 32B and Grok-2 tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.