Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AlibabaMistral

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
40.0%
Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512
40.0%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
73.9%
Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512
100.0%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
40.9%
Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512
100.0%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
5.3%
Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512
100.0%

Key Highlights

  • Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Qwen QwQ 32B
Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512
Full security profile
Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B
Full security profile
Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512

Frequently asked questions

Is Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B or Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen QwQ 32B vs Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512?

Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 has a 40.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Qwen QwQ 32B and Ministral 3 14B Reasoning 2512 tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons