Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AlibabaNVIDIA

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
40.0%
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
40.0%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
73.9%
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.0%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
40.9%
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.0%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
5.3%
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
100.0%

Key Highlights

  • NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Qwen QwQ 32B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Full security profile
Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B
Full security profile
NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1

Frequently asked questions

Is Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B or NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen QwQ 32B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1?

Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 40.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Qwen QwQ 32B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons