Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mistral Mixtral 8x7B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mixtral 8x7B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Mixtral 8x7B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mistral Mixtral 8x7B. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B or Mistral Mixtral 8x7B more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mixtral 8x7B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mixtral 8x7B?
Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Mixtral 8x7B has a 38.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Qwen QwQ 32B and Mixtral 8x7B tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.