Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AlibabaMistral

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral 8x22B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).

Head-to-Head Overview

Mistral 8x22B is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B. Green marks the safer model on each metric.

Overall (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
40.0%
Mistral 8x22B
31.5%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
73.9%
Mistral 8x22B

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
40.9%
Mistral 8x22B

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Qwen QwQ 32B
5.3%
Mistral 8x22B
12.2%

Key Highlights

  • Mistral Mistral 8x22B has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Qwen QwQ 32B
Mistral 8x22B
Full security profile
Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B
Full security profile
Mistral Mistral 8x22B

Frequently asked questions

Is Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B or Mistral Mistral 8x22B more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral 8x22B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen QwQ 32B vs Mistral 8x22B?

Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Mistral 8x22B has a 31.5% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Qwen QwQ 32B and Mistral 8x22B tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons