Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Deepseek Deepseek V3
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Deepseek V3 scores 47.2% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Qwen QwQ 32B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Deepseek Deepseek V3. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B or Deepseek Deepseek V3 more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Deepseek V3 scores 47.2% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen QwQ 32B vs Deepseek V3?
Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Deepseek V3 has a 47.2% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Qwen QwQ 32B and Deepseek V3 tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.