Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Cohere Command R
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Cohere Command R is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Command R scores 32.9% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Command R is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B vs Cohere Command R. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Cohere Command R has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Cohere Command R has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Cohere Command R has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B or Cohere Command R more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Cohere Command R is the more secure of the two: Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% and Command R scores 32.9% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen QwQ 32B vs Command R?
Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR and Command R has a 32.9% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Qwen QwQ 32B and Command R tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.