Mistral Mixtral 8x7B vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mixtral 8x7B is the more secure of the two: Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Mixtral 8x7B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Mistral Mixtral 8x7B vs NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Mistral Mixtral 8x7B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Mixtral 8x7B or NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mixtral 8x7B is the more secure of the two: Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Mixtral 8x7B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1?
Mixtral 8x7B has a 38.0% ASR and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 40.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Mixtral 8x7B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.