Meta Prompt Guard 2 86M vs ProtectAI LLM Guard

Detailed comparison for runtime guardrails

MetaProtectAI

On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, ProtectAI LLM Guard is the more secure of the two: Prompt Guard 2 86M scores NaN% and LLM Guard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).

Head-to-Head Overview

LLM Guard is the overall winner in this comparison!

Guardrail Metrics

F1 Score

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

Accuracy

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

Precision

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

Recall

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

False Positive Rate

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

False Negative Rate

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

Average Latency (ms)

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

p50 Latency (ms)

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

p90 Latency (ms)

Prompt Guard 2 86M
0.000
LLM Guard
0.000

Key Highlights

No specific highlights generated for this comparison.

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

F1 ScoreAccuracyPrecisionRecallFPRFNRAverage Latency (ms)p50 Latency (ms)p90 Latency (ms)
Prompt Guard 2 86M
LLM Guard
Full security profile
Meta Prompt Guard 2 86M
Full security profile
ProtectAI LLM Guard

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta Prompt Guard 2 86M or ProtectAI LLM Guard more secure?

On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, ProtectAI LLM Guard is the more secure of the two: Prompt Guard 2 86M scores NaN% and LLM Guard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).

What is the F1 score of Prompt Guard 2 86M vs LLM Guard?

Prompt Guard 2 86M scores NaN% F1 and LLM Guard scores NaN% F1 on Guardion's prompt-attack benchmark. F1 balances precision and recall — higher is better.

How were Prompt Guard 2 86M and LLM Guard tested?

Both were evaluated via API at production-like sensitivity against 30+ prompt-attack categories using zero-shot, Crescendo, and TAP methods, scored by F1.

Related Comparisons