Meta Llama 3H 405B vs Mistral Mixtral 8x7B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Meta Llama 3H 405B is the more secure of the two: Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% and Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Llama 3H 405B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Meta Llama 3H 405B vs Mistral Mixtral 8x7B. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Meta Llama 3H 405B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Meta Llama 3H 405B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Meta Llama 3H 405B or Mistral Mixtral 8x7B more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Meta Llama 3H 405B is the more secure of the two: Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% and Mixtral 8x7B scores 38.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Llama 3H 405B vs Mixtral 8x7B?
Llama 3H 405B has a 36.6% ASR and Mixtral 8x7B has a 38.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Llama 3H 405B and Mixtral 8x7B tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.