Meta Llama 3H 405B vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral 8x22B is the more secure of the two: Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Mistral 8x22B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Meta Llama 3H 405B vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Overall (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Mistral Mistral 8x22B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Mistral Mistral 8x22B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Frequently asked questions
Is Meta Llama 3H 405B or Mistral Mistral 8x22B more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Mistral Mistral 8x22B is the more secure of the two: Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Llama 3H 405B vs Mistral 8x22B?
Llama 3H 405B has a 36.6% ASR and Mistral 8x22B has a 31.5% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Llama 3H 405B and Mistral 8x22B tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.