Google Cloud Model Armor vs Meta LlamaGuard
Detailed comparison for runtime guardrails
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Meta LlamaGuard is the more secure of the two: Model Armor scores NaN% and LlamaGuard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Model Armor is the overall winner in this comparison!
Guardrail Metrics
F1 Score
Accuracy
Precision
Recall
False Positive Rate
False Negative Rate
Average Latency (ms)
p50 Latency (ms)
p90 Latency (ms)
Key Highlights
- Google Cloud Model Armor has a better F1 Score.
- Google Cloud Model Armor has a better Accuracy.
- Google Cloud Model Armor has a better Precision.
- Google Cloud Model Armor has a better Recall.
- Meta LlamaGuard has a better False Positive Rate.
- Meta LlamaGuard has a better False Negative Rate.
- Meta LlamaGuard has a better Average Latency (ms).
- Meta LlamaGuard has a better p50 Latency (ms).
- Meta LlamaGuard has a better p90 Latency (ms).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Google Cloud Model Armor or Meta LlamaGuard more secure?
On Guardion's Prompt Attack Risk Benchmark, Meta LlamaGuard is the more secure of the two: Model Armor scores NaN% and LlamaGuard scores NaN% on F1 score (higher is better).
What is the F1 score of Model Armor vs LlamaGuard?
Model Armor scores NaN% F1 and LlamaGuard scores NaN% F1 on Guardion's prompt-attack benchmark. F1 balances precision and recall — higher is better.
How were Model Armor and LlamaGuard tested?
Both were evaluated via API at production-like sensitivity against 30+ prompt-attack categories using zero-shot, Crescendo, and TAP methods, scored by F1.