Deepseek Deepseek R1 vs Google Gemma 3 1B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Deepseek Deepseek R1 is the more secure of the two: Deepseek R1 scores 42.6% and Gemma 3 1B scores 60.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Deepseek R1 is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Deepseek Deepseek R1 vs Google Gemma 3 1B. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Deepseek Deepseek R1 has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Deepseek Deepseek R1 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Deepseek Deepseek R1 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Deepseek Deepseek R1 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Deepseek Deepseek R1 or Google Gemma 3 1B more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Deepseek Deepseek R1 is the more secure of the two: Deepseek R1 scores 42.6% and Gemma 3 1B scores 60.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Deepseek R1 vs Gemma 3 1B?
Deepseek R1 has a 42.6% ASR and Gemma 3 1B has a 60.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Deepseek R1 and Gemma 3 1B tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.