Cohere Command R Plus vs Google Gemma 3n E4B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Cohere Command R Plus is the more secure of the two: Command R Plus scores 43.3% and Gemma 3n E4B scores 52.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
Head-to-Head Overview
Command R Plus is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Cohere Command R Plus vs Google Gemma 3n E4B. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.
Overall (ASR)
TAP Attack Method (ASR)
Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Cohere Command R Plus has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Cohere Command R Plus has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
- Cohere Command R Plus has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
- Cohere Command R Plus has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Security Profile
Outward is better on every axis.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cohere Command R Plus or Google Gemma 3n E4B more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Cohere Command R Plus is the more secure of the two: Command R Plus scores 43.3% and Gemma 3n E4B scores 52.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Command R Plus vs Gemma 3n E4B?
Command R Plus has a 43.3% ASR and Gemma 3n E4B has a 52.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Command R Plus and Gemma 3n E4B tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.