Cohere Command R 7B vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B

Detailed comparison for LLMs

CohereMistral

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Cohere Command R 7B is the more secure of the two: Command R 7B scores 25.8% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).

Head-to-Head Overview

Command R 7B is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Cohere Command R 7B vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B. Green marks the safer model on each metric.

Overall (ASR)

Command R 7B
25.8%
Mistral 8x22B
31.5%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Command R 7B
45.9%
Mistral 8x22B

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Command R 7B
26.2%
Mistral 8x22B

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Command R 7B
Mistral 8x22B
12.2%

Key Highlights

  • Cohere Command R 7B has a lower Overall (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Command R 7B
Mistral 8x22B
Full security profile
Cohere Command R 7B
Full security profile
Mistral Mistral 8x22B

Frequently asked questions

Is Cohere Command R 7B or Mistral Mistral 8x22B more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Cohere Command R 7B is the more secure of the two: Command R 7B scores 25.8% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Command R 7B vs Mistral 8x22B?

Command R 7B has a 25.8% ASR and Mistral 8x22B has a 31.5% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Command R 7B and Mistral 8x22B tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons