Cohere Command 2X vs Meta Llama 3H 405B
Detailed comparison for LLMs
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Meta Llama 3H 405B is the more secure of the two: Command 2X scores 39.4% and Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
Head-to-Head Overview
Llama 3H 405B is the overall winner in this comparison!
Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)
ASR for Cohere Command 2X vs Meta Llama 3H 405B. Green marks the safer model on each metric.
Overall (ASR)
Zero-Shot (ASR)
Key Highlights
- Meta Llama 3H 405B has a lower Overall (ASR).
- Cohere Command 2X has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).
Frequently asked questions
Is Cohere Command 2X or Meta Llama 3H 405B more secure?
On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Meta Llama 3H 405B is the more secure of the two: Command 2X scores 39.4% and Llama 3H 405B scores 36.6% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).
What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Command 2X vs Llama 3H 405B?
Command 2X has a 39.4% ASR and Llama 3H 405B has a 36.6% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.
How were Command 2X and Llama 3H 405B tested?
Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.