Amazon Nova Pro vs OpenAI GPT OSS 20B

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AmazonOpenAI

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, OpenAI GPT OSS 20B is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and GPT OSS 20B scores 20.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

GPT OSS 20B is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Amazon Nova Pro vs OpenAI GPT OSS 20B. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Nova Pro
24.0%
GPT OSS 20B
20.0%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
GPT OSS 20B
100.0%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
GPT OSS 20B
100.0%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
GPT OSS 20B
100.0%

Key Highlights

  • OpenAI GPT OSS 20B has a lower Overall (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Nova Pro
GPT OSS 20B
Full security profile
Amazon Nova Pro
Full security profile
OpenAI GPT OSS 20B

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro or OpenAI GPT OSS 20B more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, OpenAI GPT OSS 20B is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and GPT OSS 20B scores 20.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Nova Pro vs GPT OSS 20B?

Nova Pro has a 24.0% ASR and GPT OSS 20B has a 20.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Nova Pro and GPT OSS 20B tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons