Amazon Nova Pro vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AmazonMistral

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Nova Pro is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Amazon Nova Pro vs Mistral Mistral 8x22B. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Nova Pro
24.0%
Mistral 8x22B
31.5%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
Mistral 8x22B

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
Mistral 8x22B

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
Mistral 8x22B
12.2%

Key Highlights

  • Amazon Nova Pro has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Mistral Mistral 8x22B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Nova Pro
Mistral 8x22B
Full security profile
Amazon Nova Pro
Full security profile
Mistral Mistral 8x22B

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro or Mistral Mistral 8x22B more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and Mistral 8x22B scores 31.5% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Nova Pro vs Mistral 8x22B?

Nova Pro has a 24.0% ASR and Mistral 8x22B has a 31.5% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Nova Pro and Mistral 8x22B tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons