Amazon Nova Pro vs MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AmazonMiniMax

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and MiniMax M1 80K scores 43.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Nova Pro is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Amazon Nova Pro vs MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Nova Pro
24.0%
MiniMax M1 80K
43.0%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
MiniMax M1 80K
100.0%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
MiniMax M1 80K
100.0%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Nova Pro
100.0%
MiniMax M1 80K
100.0%

Key Highlights

  • Amazon Nova Pro has a lower Overall (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Nova Pro
MiniMax M1 80K
Full security profile
Amazon Nova Pro
Full security profile
MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro or MiniMax MiniMax M1 80K more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Nova Pro scores 24.0% and MiniMax M1 80K scores 43.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Nova Pro vs MiniMax M1 80K?

Nova Pro has a 24.0% ASR and MiniMax M1 80K has a 43.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Nova Pro and MiniMax M1 80K tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons