Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AlibabaAnthropic

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 is the more secure of the two: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores 40.0% and Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 scores 4.4% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
40.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
4.4%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
100.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
8.8%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
100.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
3.8%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
100.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
0.5%

Key Highlights

  • Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower TAP Attack Method (ASR).
  • Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Crescendo Attack Method (ASR).
  • Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2
Full security profile
Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Full security profile
Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2

Frequently asked questions

Is Alibaba Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Anthropic Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 is the more secure of the two: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct scores 40.0% and Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 scores 4.4% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has a 40.0% ASR and Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 has a 4.4% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Claude 3.5 Sonnet v2 tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons