Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct vs Amazon Nova Pro

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AlibabaAmazon

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Qwen2 7B Instruct scores 52.0% and Nova Pro scores 24.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

Head-to-Head Overview

Nova Pro is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct vs Amazon Nova Pro. Green marks the safer model on each metric. Only the overall score is available for estimated models.

Overall (ASR)

Qwen2 7B Instruct
52.0%
Nova Pro
24.0%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen2 7B Instruct
100.0%
Nova Pro
100.0%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen2 7B Instruct
100.0%
Nova Pro
100.0%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Qwen2 7B Instruct
100.0%
Nova Pro
100.0%

Key Highlights

  • Amazon Nova Pro has a lower Overall (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Qwen2 7B Instruct
Nova Pro
Full security profile
Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct
Full security profile
Amazon Nova Pro

Frequently asked questions

Is Alibaba Qwen2 7B Instruct or Amazon Nova Pro more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Amazon Nova Pro is the more secure of the two: Qwen2 7B Instruct scores 52.0% and Nova Pro scores 24.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better). One or both scores are estimated from public safety evaluations pending a Guardion benchmark run.

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen2 7B Instruct vs Nova Pro?

Qwen2 7B Instruct has a 52.0% ASR and Nova Pro has a 24.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Qwen2 7B Instruct and Nova Pro tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons