Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB vs Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B

Detailed comparison for LLMs

AlibabaAlibaba

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB is the more secure of the two: Qwen 7-72BB scores 36.5% and Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).

Head-to-Head Overview

Qwen 7-72BB is the overall winner in this comparison!

Attack Success Rate (lower is safer)

ASR for Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB vs Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B. Green marks the safer model on each metric.

Overall (ASR)

Qwen 7-72BB
36.5%
Qwen QwQ 32B
40.0%

TAP Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen 7-72BB
Qwen QwQ 32B
73.9%

Crescendo Attack Method (ASR)

Qwen 7-72BB
Qwen QwQ 32B
40.9%

Zero-Shot (ASR)

Qwen 7-72BB
9.5%
Qwen QwQ 32B
5.3%

Key Highlights

  • Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB has a lower Overall (ASR).
  • Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B has a lower Zero-Shot (ASR).

Security Profile

Outward is better on every axis.

OverallTAPCrescendoZero-Shot
Qwen 7-72BB
Qwen QwQ 32B
Full security profile
Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB
Full security profile
Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B

Frequently asked questions

Is Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB or Alibaba Qwen QwQ 32B more secure?

On Guardion's LLM vulnerability Benchmark, Alibaba Qwen 7-72BB is the more secure of the two: Qwen 7-72BB scores 36.5% and Qwen QwQ 32B scores 40.0% on attack success rate (ASR) (lower is better).

What is the attack success rate (ASR) of Qwen 7-72BB vs Qwen QwQ 32B?

Qwen 7-72BB has a 36.5% ASR and Qwen QwQ 32B has a 40.0% ASR — the share of adversarial prompts that succeed across zero-shot, TAP, and Crescendo attacks. Lower is safer.

How were Qwen 7-72BB and Qwen QwQ 32B tested?

Both were red-teamed with the HarmBench framework across zero-shot, TAP (Tree of Attacks with Pruning), and Crescendo multi-turn attacks, scored by Attack Success Rate.

Related Comparisons